female
object
desire
satisfaction
the other
separate...


what we see in the series I am working on, is a female body translated in to forms which are abstract and we need to look at them carefully to see what they are. we see details and marks on the photographs and we might even want to take a step closer and try to figure out what they are, why they are there and what they mean. so what we are doing here is studying the pictures; pictures which will show us that the beauty of a woman is beyond the physical form.

self portrait

Paula Rae Gibson

This work is called : Is this about me or you

Kiki Smith

Kiki Smith

I was looking at kiki simth and I found her work very interesting , that was a suggestion from one of the artists that was giving me a critique... it was inspiring and i got some ideas.


Kiki Smith is a feminist multi-media artist who, for the past twenty years, has explored the body from inside to outside, conflating the borders between the two, and has helped to restore the human body to a central place in contemporary art. Though western art has long been fascinated with the human body, especially the female body, the body parts she is interested are not typically found in art. She examines body functions and parts that are culturally taboo and embarrassing. Many of her works are body fragments, such as prints taken from organs or a porcelain pelvis on a pedestal. Blood, fluids, sperm, tears all appear in her works as emotionally charged elements. Her art is messy, open, uncomfortable. It is indecorous rather than polite, personal rather than official, unpredictable rather focused, meandering rather than goal oriented. Her figures bridge the gap between seductive beauty and grotesque body, open, leaking, uncontained.

He is not part of me,
but he is me, and
I am him ...


why do we always want to see everything with our eyes in order to believe in them... why can't we use our feelings?! why can't we feel everything and translate that to a new image ?!
There is a part of me that belongs to him and there is a part that belongs to her.... who is she? and who is he? It is me...

I am neither me,
nor are you you,
nor are you me
and yet,
I am me
and you are you
and yet
you are me.
I am in a state of wonder, whether I am you or you are me
By Rumi

Art is as much a response to and reflection of the larger environment around us as it is to our immediate work space.

More on Starn Twins

INTRODUCTION
Providing a point of reference that embodies both literal and symbolic meaning, Mike and Doug Starn utilize the theme of light as a central component in their work. Light, an inherent element in both vision and photography, is a simple yet powerful vector of life, knowledge and enlightenment. The Starns’ researches have spurred interconnected bodies of artworks that combine seemingly classical images of trees and leaves, branch-like angiograms, and other complex patterns that allude to the cardiovascular system and the neuronal structure of the brain.In these interpretations of flora, trees—dependent on photosynthesis and its carbon deposits—become the calligraphy of the sun and are a point of entry into the body of work called Absorption of Light, the Starns’ territory of philosophical investigations.A photograph is vision and thought written by light in its opposite. Paradoxically, black is not a void of light; black is filled with light, black is a reservoir of light: in the Starns’ conception, black illuminates.Through their innovative and conceptual layering of images of natural phenomena with those made by the most advanced scientific and medical technology, the artists establish a unique lexicon of visual metaphors. The Starns have drawn on a variety of techniques from the history of photography and the current digital age to create this body of work. By mingling the antique with the contemporary, both in subject matter and materials, the artworks are a reflection of veins flowing between many branches of knowledge.“We cannot understand the forces which are effective in the visual production of today if we do not have a look at other fields of modern life.”This statement, made by the German art historian Alexander Dorner in the early part of the twentieth century, resonates in the work of Doug and Mike Starn. Perhaps, because they are identical twins, their existence is already a coincidence of nature decodable by science, and their art is intuitively interdisciplinary. Art and science merge when a gnarled black branch reaches for the light and our thoughts stretch to follow its lead, or the initial visual impact of a leaf magnified for inspection dissolves into delicacy: The Starns link the evident and the ephemeral. Their process is based on the idea that visual art exists as a laboratory for knowledge, both physical and philosophical. Their work serves as both a record of observation and a portal for contemplation. —JD Talasek
ESSAY
“From Imaging to Image”For many years, advancement in biological psychiatry involved innovations in molecular biochemistry and biophysics. We learned which substances potentiated which cellular events, and mapped unfathomably complex chains of reaction. We began to understand transporter theory and to trace episodes so quick that they seemed to defy our notions about time. We digitized consciousness into neural components, and specified the electrical impulses and chemical interactions involved in every process from aggression to love to the formation of memories. On the basis of these insights, new compounds were designed to treat a variety of previously intractable mental and neurological illnesses. Their novel mechanisms of action were somewhat meanly represented by formulae and theories and abbreviations and equations. What we understood surpassed our abilities of description.In the past decade, that has changed. Many of the most important developments in brain science have been in imaging. With the emergence of MRI and other advanced technologies, we have begun to chart what is happening deep and fast, things we couldn’t see with any previous methods, and this visual capacity is allowing us a fluid mastery previously inconceivable. The word “imaging” suggests photography, but in fact what an imaging mechanism provides is a great accrual of numbers, which computers put together to make visual symbols of neural activity. The image is the humanization of information too vast to absorb otherwise: if a picture is worth a thousand words, it is worth a hundred thousand numbers. With imaging, what was abstract becomes palpable; what we comprehend visually is more convincing to us than numeric sequences. Suddenly, we are looking into the brain itself while it is alive and active. Jules Verne never proposed anything more thrilling and unlikely. We can take someone’s consciousness, previously a philosophical problem, and describe what it looks like; we can subtype illnesses because we can see the difference between one and the next before we even begin noting symptoms. Our wildest explorations of outer space have never brought us more startling, informative, weird pictures than these graphic translations of magnetism and mathematics.Doug and Mike Starn have always made work that looks deep inside their subjects and addresses the status of the image both as representation of fact and as fact itself. Their photographs are not shorthand for numbers, but they are just as full of information as brain scans, vivid and explicit manifestations of the intersections between reality and ideas. Their early distressed images reflect the transience of photographic truth, which documents a reality already long gone when a print is made. This material contemplates the history of the image as well as of the subject. In more recent pictures, they have explicitly studied light, the medium and message of all photography. In some pieces (“Attracted to Light”), they examine the interaction between light and desire: moths flit towards a glow, their powdery wings refracting the brightness for the sake of which they so often give their lives.The Starns’ newest body of work (“Structure of Thought”) uses trees to express the relationship between the light that makes photographic prints and the translation of that light into life through the process of photosynthesis. In some sense, the tree is light made flesh, much as the brain scan is math made image. The physical resemblance between these depictions of trees and leaves and portrayals of the seemingly infinite branching of dendrites is striking, but the deeper parallel lies in the fact, rather than the appearance, of a functional complexity. The tree photos are not x-rays; what they show is out there to be seen by anyone. Yet they take on a diagrammatic quality and seem to elucidate the structural architecture of plants. They remind us how natural order often looks, at first glance, like chaos.The essence of the trees is a system of distribution, in which the massive trunk relies on the branches, which in turn depend on leaves; there is a symbiosis between the singular and the multiple. This process is akin in some ways to the process of cell division on which life is predicated, and, equally, to the relationship between a photographic negative and the many generations of prints that can be made from it. As we look at the Starns’ trees, we recognize how the strength of the core relies on the constant fine division of the component parts. The leaf series (“Black Pulse”) is a logical extension of the tree series: the multitudinous veins of the leaf are yet further refinements of the capillaries represented by the Rapunzel cascade of the branches. The series limns the innumerable divisions by which living things survive, demonstrating how the endless branching that we can see becomes an endless branching of what we cannot. It is as though this were a family tree, the trunk a great patriarch, the branches sons and daughters, the leaves all full of cousins.

Structure of Thought 16 (preparatory composition), 21 3/4 x 133 1/2 in., 2005. This piece is derived from an image of many cerebal neurons expressed with yellow fluorescent protein. Courtesy Dr. Karel Svoboda, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.These images resemble, also, the decision trees of game theory. Every possible choice has a variety of consequences, and every one of those has a variety of further sequellae, and so our minds from a single simple question develop an unfathomable variety of ideas; multiplicity is the shape of consciousness. Every thought generates myriad potentials, and intelligence relies on the capacity to keep all these overlapping and sometimes contradictory implications simultaneously active. If you can see the mass of the trunk and the veins of the leaves, you can achieve mental and psychological sophistication: you can contemplate outcomes and make what we call informed decisions. You can become wise. These photographs translate wisdom into a visual iconography.What should not go unnoticed in all these profound studies is beauty. We love both order and complexity, and the Starns are able to achieve a high level of both. Crowded as Brueghel, strange as Bosch, symmetrical as Leonardo, and rich as Rembrandt, these images are endlessly satisfying. Trees are lovely anyway, but here the artists have distilled that loveliness. These are not only splendid forests, but also magnificent photographs of the very structures of life.
Andrew Solomon

Diary 06

Innocence

 pure

 Water

 Fish

silence

Birth

Innocence

Pure

Water

Fish

Silence

Birth

Silence

Silence

Silence

Silence

Innocent

Fish

Pure

Water

Silent 

Birth

Silence

Silence

Silence

Innocent Fish

Pure Water

Silent Birth

Silence...

Diary 05

The more I think , the more I get confused, and I can't come up with any answers...

what is real and what is unreal? I don't know

why is it important to find out that a male and female experience life differently? I don't know, is that important at all?!! I don't know

Is that really related to my senior project? I don't know

I don't even know if I know or not!

At the same time I know, and I have all the answers to those questions.

Instead of thinking a bout everything ,I try to look at them, observe and feel them and the answers usually come by themselves.

This week I was just focusing on my body I was looking at myself , but not like always,I felt I was a new person to myself , I was going beyond the physical form and I was trying to look at my body with a new vision, as if my body has more to it than just what can be seen with the eyes. the gender is not important, in this case I happen to be a woman, so what?!

I realized that both female and male aspects are necessary in humans in order for them to be complete and balanced, as it is the same in nature. In order for that to happen one should become transparent to ones self and others , and what i mean by transparent is to break the wall between the self and the other.

The differences are not there to be questioned, but to be put together to bring harmony, to become complete, and eventually one.

That is not all!

untitled

Ditty of First Desire

In the green morning I wanted to be a heart.
A heart.

And in the ripe evening I wanted to be a nightingale.
A nightingale.

(Soul,turn orange-colored.Soul,turn the color of love.)

In the vivid morning I wanted to be myself.
A heart.

And at the evening's end I wanted to be my voice.
A nightingale.


Soul,turn orange-colored.Soul,turn the color of love.

By Federico García Lorca

darkroom print

Diary 04

Getting lost in getting lost is my way,
existence in nonexistence is my faith...
By Rumi


I was trying to find my self and I couldn't ;I couldn't because I was trying. I couldn't because I was looking at what I have always been looking at , my eyes and my mind are used to seeing everything in a certain way...
By finding I mean truly knowing who I am ....and to truly see myself as a human being. A human being that is experiencing herself in a form of a female in this life. The more I look at the physical world the more i get lost, the more I try to understand the forms the more they loos their meanings. It is time to stop understanding everything through the names, labels, and their physical appearance...
what is left is beyond the form.